This may not be a bad idea CinniDev---to push back the snapshot until a majority at least are prepared for it.  Also, to the community...please contact BTER, BTC38 and Poloniex as they are the most likely to honor the snapshot with shares in future DACs (and BTER/BTC38 will be far more likely to list Cinni in their exchange). 

Another great idea would be to get the bitshares community (and devs) on board and willing to help you bring value to all stakeholders through advice and expertise of those who actually engineered DPOS.  By honoring those who created it (wouldn't you honor Satoshi if you could?), you accomplish this.  

To those who dislike the idea of honoring PTS/AGS holders, it might not be a bad idea to diversify into bitshares PTS to get a cut (if/when CinniDev decides to do this).  In so doing, you ally yourselves with us and we ally ourselves with you...and this is a huge benefit.

PTS and AGS were used to fund the development of the technology that is going to increase the value of Cinni over time...and DPOS based DACs will likely eventually be born on this chain (if everyone plays their cards right).  The benefits of honoring a simple 20% of the snapshot to PTS/AGS holders who fund the constant improvements, enterprise level scalability, tx speeds are numerous.  

It also increases the chance that Cinnicoin holders will be "Sharedropped" a % of shares in DACs that come out for DPOS-Based chains, for instance (wouldnt it be nice to have a chance to actually get shares in DACs made by bitshares' Devs for official bitshares chains (like bitshares Play (gaming DAC) or others?...just for holding Cinni.). If there is no PTS/AGS contribution, however, it is pretty much ensured Devs building DACs that honor PTS/AGS holders will never think to honor Cinni Holders.  

This is a GREAT place to extend one's gratitude in the knowledge that it will likely pay everyone back substantially more than they gave in the future.  

P.S.  I have purchased Cinni, so I will get a cut regardless the decision...but I hope