it's a good coin but it's downfall is it's distribution + community hates negative comments about this coin and ignore you without really debating with you
If there are sensible points to debate then we'll debate. I don't know how many posts I've made on technical / economic subjects in the last 2 months. 2-tier architecture vs 1-tier, support for legacy commercial interfaces vs revised ones, the economics of fiat vs crypto and which cryptos are in a position to benefit, the merits of counting vs not counting masternode holdings towards marketcap, privacy vs anonymity and the "libertarian argument", speculative vs real value.... I could go on and on.
Theres a ton of things you could be challenging. Yet all people ever come up with is:
- "the price keeps falling and everyone on here said it was going to the moon"
- "we can't take any criticism"
- "there are big holders due to instamine"
You people sure know how to give a guy a migrane. Change the record ffs or come up with some semi-informed commentary.
I for one am not responsible for the price and unless it goes to zero, I don't really give a sh*t what it is at this point in the coin's life. Also be advised this is an [ANN] thread and if you don't expect holders to be championing the coin for all it's worth during a big rise then go and read the Financial Times for investment advice.
and of great interest to me. I'd be very happy to keep reading them. Your assessments on global financial issues and the games being played out by the central bankers (and all the other manipulators of currencies) I think are spot on. Thanks