Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: [NXT] Testnet for Automated Transactions (AT) - Turing Completeness for Nxt
by
Daedelus
on 13/10/2014, 08:06:25 UTC
Some time ago, Knowles said he's abandoning it due to disinterest from NXT core developers.  However, if you follow the link I gave above you'll see that NxtAT is still very much alive.  Presumably Knowles gave the funds to the developers who are continuing the project.  You might ask them for verification.


Ian has left NxtAt (hot off the press yesterday) presumably to implement AT in the first coin to meet the bounty. Vbecas and btc2nxt are developing NxtAT.


I don't usually acknowledge Bluemeanie but as he keeps intruding and adding nothing...


BM knows the state of AT, he follows nxtforum very closely. He is just trying to undermine it. He takes Nxt's positives and then tries to pillory them: Nxt itself > Jl777 > Supernet > Threatening Nxters with legal > Doxxing single mothers, trying to get them fired and now it looks like CIYAM is next.

I wouldn't recommend trying to enter a dialogue with him, he has a history of ignoring my posts and I haven't seen him answer a question yet. Or provide any evidence for anything he claims, working on the basis that "throw enough sh!t some of it will stick" rather than "this is my claim supported by evidence a, b, c...".

This is what he is trying to obfuscate > http://cointelegraph.com/news/112643/the-mystery-of-the-missing-1000000-nxt
BM acts as though it is an opinion piece but the blockchain doesn't lie and his promo messages are signed with his PGP signature. You can make up your own mind, everyone who has looked at the evidence is unanimous in their verdict.


Fortunately, this mud slinging tactic of his will only have an effect on those who don't do their own research. So you will be fine  Grin I haven't made it onto his 'enemies' list yet but it is only a matter of time. After all, I have publicly disagreed with him