If you get the consent to publish both in full please do. Realise that "cherry picking" though through a partial log might not be a smart long term strategy.
I have browsed through both. I have not responded you in the group. It's just a few consecutive complaints of you about my wrong-doing.
I received some advise from other people too, but the "advise" is irrelevant here.
We'll never have permission to post the group chat most likely. And you don't give me the permission to post the private chat. The private chat starts with a greeting and was never continued after the day. It's not partial log.
So the only person can shed some light on this all and is not bound by some NDA and has/had access to all the information is the very hacker. IIRC he has/had access to Patrick computer or at least his emails. Maybe we can convince him to publish Patricks email database. I am pretty sure he copied all of them, hackers usually do this.
BTW, am I the only one that feels a little strange that apparently Patrick does the claim thing alone? The very person that shared this computer with the hacker. Now I should send him all of private data?
I believe that his computer is not hacked. Only the email server was compromised. Also, I have checked the claim verification email system (I set it up and I still have some access) and the entire chain is clean and secure.
We have replaced all the compromised servers and Internet accounts (we re-registered new ones).
Your passports are in my private repository (AES-256 encrypted), and the previous API access key was revoked. I'm the only person with access to such information now. Patrick et al. can request for the repository once they need it, but currently they don't.