Dan reviewing other coin's code is the best marketing strategy XC could have.
All of the other coin's investor's see their coin's code was reviewed by a guy named Dan, and so they look him up...
This leads them to XC... and because they are already invested in a coin that Dan is reviewing they are more likely to invest in XC.
This is a VERY high yield marketing strategy, and money cannot buy better leads than this.
yeah no. I see a dev reviewing shitcoins and I see a developer who isn't excited enough about his own project to funnel all of his energy there.
Throw in the fact that the coins are competing - I see a developer who doesn't understand the term conflict of interest.
So no. That's not what everyone sees.
In order to avoid repeating myself a third time, please read the posts in the three days prior to XC's announcement of its
.
If you still don't get the value of collaboration after that, no-one can help you.