Please don't feed the troll. We've been over this many many times.

Nobody knows how to get the same hash by changing the input. That's the whole point.

The ideal cryptographic hash function has four main properties:

* it is easy to compute the hash value for any given message

* it is infeasible to generate a message that has a given hash

* it is infeasible to modify a message without changing the hash

* it is infeasible to find two different messages with the same hash.

If you click 'ignore', you won't see his messages. You'll only get to see his nonsense if someone else quotes it. If enough of us do it, there won't be anyone left to quote it.

You may say I'm a dreamer. But I'm not the only one.