But to me it seems like a way to get a hold of tech by collaboration and to me points towards money due to pressure from people with money on Dan to use his name, which is what its for but seems to be used a lot lately. More so then over the techs ability to help people in the future which some projects are really focused on and some are focused on just money grabs and misleading marketing i.e using Dans name.. Don't get me wrong these are just my opinions and they stand until we see more develop here and provocative as my opinions are they really are not so out there at least some think so. As you said we will see soon. Thanks.
My apologies but it was difficult wading through that paragraph.
If I interpreted correctly, you saying that these coins are on board to use Dan's name, i.e. the coin reviews solicited by Key, Aero and others in order to grant them credibility and a price increase on the markets.
Big difference. Those reviews were solicited.
The devs listed on the Blocknet, as far as I can see and interpret, have value/unique features that contribute and are serious enough to have access to XC's foundation...meaning that they all add to the user experience Blocknet will be attempting to create. It's a two way street.
I respect a healthy suspicion of motives, for sure, but I am not seeing that here. Everyone benefits and if things work out well, they all benefit from each others developing experience which to me is preferable to working by oneself.
And as I mentioned above...collaboration does not necessarily require the relinquishing of specifics.