regards.
I like you, you have spunk. You walk into a community, use the wrong terminology and then tell the community that THEY are wrong.
Takes balls.
Too true.
Keep the terminology aside please, we can argue on that for years - please focus on the main thing:
extra features on alternative blockchain easily accessible to bitcoiners.No. We are communicating through text. Terminology is all we have to ensure clear communication. We cannot infer what you mean if you use the wrong words.
It's like saying "I want to give this motorcycle 4WD" when you mean "I want to give this motorcycle off-road abilities". One is confusing, one makes sense.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but if you're on an alternative blockchain, you are separate from bitcoin and bitcoiners (seriously, I'm new to some of this, is this true?).
I am sorry if my words are confusing, I just wanted to get a feedback on the functionality proposed and it is all of the benefit of anyone using bitcoins.
Yes, you are right , I am on alternative blockchain, therefore separated from bitcoin and I would like to create a "bridge" so bitcoiner can benefit of it.
Speaking of alternative blockchain, Ethereum will have it's own blockchain, separate from Bitcoin ,yet it is considered a Bitcoin 2.0 technology...what I am trying to say is that this is really new and people do have different point of views...