This was my old contribution from January, 2012.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=61343.0
I made a little headway and graphed it, though I don't have access to it here
Several years with this thing and I'm still confused as to whether I'm onto something really cool or it's a hunk of garbage.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=61343.0
I made a little headway and graphed it, though I don't have access to it here
Several years with this thing and I'm still confused as to whether I'm onto something really cool or it's a hunk of garbage.
You missed that plain logic of this following:
God is all. God is the universe. God is oneness. God is light. God is love. God is consciousness.
God is positivity.
Ego is none. Ego is fear. Ego is death. Ego is doubt. Ego is random.
Ego is negativity.
God believes in everything. Ego believes in nothing.
Everything is everything.
Nothing is nothing.
Everything = ∞
Nothing = 0
Multiply any form of logic times zero, what do you get?
God is positivity.
Ego is none. Ego is fear. Ego is death. Ego is doubt. Ego is random.
Ego is negativity.
God believes in everything. Ego believes in nothing.
Everything is everything.
Nothing is nothing.
Everything = ∞
Nothing = 0
Multiply any form of logic times zero, what do you get?
Waiting for the math???
Are words not a form of logic just as numbers?
x * 0 = 0
x * ∞ = ∞x
So, you hold self awareness, correct? Are you nothing? Or are you everything?
The answer is not in the math equation. The answer is in the answer. Do you see?
I can only open the door, you must step through yourself.
Consider these mathematical laws:
1) Any real number, when divided by zero, produces modulus and quotient zero.
2) Any real number multiplied by zero is equal to zero.
Therefore, it logically follows, that zero divided by zero is equal to zero.
1) Any real number, when divided by zero, produces modulus and quotient zero.
2) Any real number multiplied by zero is equal to zero.
Therefore, it logically follows, that zero divided by zero is equal to zero.
Premise 1 is false, it presupposes you can divide by zero, this operation is undefined. The division algorithm states
a=bq + r, where b|a (b divides a), The set of R/0 is not closed under division, or the multiplication inverse.
R/0 is an indeterminate form. It is undefined. A limiting process can be applied to an indeterminate form, but remember the episilon-delta proof, the limit never actually gets to zero, only "as close as we like"
The whole process shoudl be restricted to integers anyway to eliminate irrational numbers in the real set.
Right! If you divide something by 0, that's the same as dividing it by nothing. If something isn't divided, the thing that is left is the original something, right? Therefore, 2/0=2.
Arithmatical division is both the taking and making of groups.
An arithmatical quotient is that number of groups made or taken as a result of that division.
∴ That arithmatical quotient of arithmatical division by zero (id est, that number of groups of, quantitatively, nothing one can take/make from any something) is absolute (indeed, that exact opposite [logical not] of quantitative nothing, "−0").
Oh, play the mathematical BS. This is the exact reason stuff is so confounded.
Take 10 Arabs in the desert. Divide their number by 2 and you get 2 groups of 5, right. Since "0" is nothing, divide them by nothing and they are not divide, right? So, there are still 10 Arabs, right?
English has its characteristic laws that don't make any sense. Mathematics is a language that has characteristic laws that don't make any sense as well. It's the reason that we have flaws in our thinking.
Look, -0 is absence of zero. So, what exactly is the amount of non-zero?
Wasn't a question. Was English. Non-zero is the set of whatever we were talking about = 10 Arabs.
See this following limakasidian number line:
Code:
−∞
−10 −9 −8 −7 −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
∞
−0
−0
I'm not quite sure how to respond to this. I have no idea how this relates to my post, and if there was sarcasm, I definitely missed it.