Necessitating future adjustment. A change that does not resolve the fundamental problem, and addresses only the immediate perceptions of today.
Now define "right". Is it simply a block size which grows/shrinks dynamically with real world bandwidth over time? What if usage demand is far higher? What if the BTC exchange rate experiences unending volatility due to uncertainty about usage capacity (ie its user base)?
In other words does not needing future bandwidth adjustment automatically mean "right"?
In the same way that a fixed 1MB is "wrong".
Not according to
these people. They think 1MB is the right answer for "many more years" and until we know it's "safe" to change. Can't you see any answer given is subjective? With that being the case doesn't it make sense to adopt a solution which can fit the most common perception of Bitcoin's promise, which certainly includes global usage, and can win popular support?