It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...
Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community.
Its claims like this that make investors run away.
+1
i think so too. and it really sucks to see the price falling like a stone.
maybe the blocknet idea wasn't the best idea at all? i think publishing this idea after REV3 was released would be much better as we lost 30% in just a few days.
even most of the coins that joined the blocknet train are nearly worthless
Coin - Marketcap - Price change last 7 days
APEX - $ 62,861 +225.72 %
SSD - $ 126,504 +15.98 %
SWIFT - $ 491,164 +13.32 %
XST - $ 369,854 +1.69 %
NHZ - $ 188,442 -13.81 %
UTIL - $ 150,427 +31.07 %
FIBRE - $ 190,156 -11.86 %
XC - $ 1,942,676 -28.71 %
Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless?
Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$?
And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically.
I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to
build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins.
This is exactly my doubt - XC, top 20 coin associated itself with note know coins, so that unknown coins associated themselves with well known XC. Result I expect is "psychological value" flow from XC to those less known coins.