Anyone who points out flaws in their argument is working for "the man."
What flaws?
You clearly were working for "the man", that isn't in dispute. I was pointing out that people that work for "the man" are unsurprisingly also defensive of "the man". Part of it is selection bias, but I'm sure a large part of it is also social conditioning. Not to mention, you know, getting paid to keep your criticisms of the ethics of the system you work for to yourself, and to vote for the continuation of that teat...
It is funny that you claim the arguments have been "thoroughly defended." How is that?
Do you really want to know? I don't think you do. Evidence suggests you just want to spend your time telling us who we are and what our positions are.
You are one who is brainwashed because you get your info from internet discussion boards and meme's and you don't interact with the public at large.
Oh do I? Tell me more about myself.
Government is too big and too intrusive in people's lives but it does not follow that everybody wants government eliminated...
Who says that? Anarcho-Capitalists are not in the business of telling everybody else what they want.
...everyone is going to switch to Bitcoin because of it...
People tend to use money that best meets their needs.
...that people want the Silk Road guy released if he is guilty...
Guilty of what?
...and that this whole process of using Bitcoin will end wars.
Bitcoin makes funding war difficult because it is immune to inflation. It does not "end all wars".