Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Official Anoncoin chat thread (including history)
by
stopthecensors
on 22/10/2014, 22:38:04 UTC
At this point it looks like the 'cryptsy problem' was actually the 'anc problem'. Now k1ll3r or however the little retard spells his name will keep coming up with excuses or lame fixes.

Anoncoin was a good coin. It has been sabotaged from within by its own devs.

There are lots of highly competent groups working on anonymous coins and yet anc devs cling to the broken zerocoin that will deliver nothing even if it works as intended. Of course there are a legion of shills repeating endlessly 'hurrah for anc, its trustless, read the wiki' etc etc

fucking bunch of conmen

‘Internet Trolls’ Are Actually Jerks in Real Life Too, According to Study

stopthecensors has some undeniable arguments. Most of the recent investors like me lost a bunch of BTC. What's your point in being cynical?

Where to draw the line? What is gambling and what is investing when it comes to altcoins?

Most people who buy alt coins don't invest, they gamble. And those who loose more often then they win tend to be bad at it. But most people overestimate their own abilities and they also tend to be sore losers.

I've bought all my ANC at around 50k satoshi so I'm still good to cash out now and stop supporting this project.  I agree most of the people very upset here are not really investors they were gambling on speculation.  Hurling insults and trolling never solved anything.  Trolls usually do it for the attention only.  So he bought in high and had to sell low and he's blaming everyone but himself for the error and misjudgment.  No one in this thread sold any kind of investment or promise of price rises.  If you've been following the thread long enough or really done your homework.  You'd find this is not the first major delay Anoncoin has hit with the Zerocoin roadmap.  So this delay should have really been factored in to anyone's gambling plan.

What kind of disingenuous stupidity does it take to pretend you are 'investing' while others are 'speculating'?

Coins are highly speculative. Semantic games just show how manipulative some scumbags are.

Whether gambling, speculating or investing there is a bare minimum of ethical responsibility the house has toward clients.

There has been overwhelming evidence for quite some time that anc devs and some others outside the dev circle have not even an ethics roadmap. They are following some devious agenda at the expense of the public.

People like you mathew3 and fuckbuddy are the most disgusting. You call critics 'trolls' so you don't have to address their complaints. You and those like you are the scum who turned fiat to trash and now you are polluting crypto with your disease.

Zerocoin is fatally flawed. It is not suitable for use as an anonymizer. I have only a basic college education and I figured that out some time ago. It is not possible that every single anc dev as well as most of the people on this forum are below the intelligence threshold needed to see that. There is deliberate deception in promoting zc, some agenda.

Anc still is salvageable. It has a history and a following. Step one is to decide what the goal is.

Is the goal to sabotage the 'anonymous' brand? It sure as fuck looks that way.