Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: Crypti | XCR | Ͼ | 3 PoS algorithms | Ed25519 | 2nd Gen Source
by
5000Bitcoins
on 24/10/2014, 04:19:15 UTC


Read my reply months ago, before IPO and you will find me asking for more info on the algo and white paper - reason was to see what sort of technical solutions devs had in mind for the problems they wanted to solve, it became clear devs were not going to release an exact or specific outline of their algo and I bought in anyway. It now appears that there WAS NO defined algo at the time, only an idea of what the algo should accomplish.



They did have a working algo for the PoT.  It worked just fine as long as there were not more than 50 nodes up.  Once there were more than that, a scaling issue surfaced.

That resulted in most of the nodes not getting any forged blocks, and the nodes with the least latency were getting lots and lots of generated blocks.  There were also forks and "forks of forks" as the longer latency nodes were not updated quickly enough.  Many transactions showed as confirmed, but were never received, including 1200XCR I sent to my windows wallet/node from Cryptsy (which still has not arrived and not shown in the balance on Cryptsy).

They then reworked the wallet/node to correct any forking at every block, but it did not fix the scaling issue.  Several fixes were tested, but were unsatisfactory.  Now we have hired a programmer who is very experienced in altcoin programing to write the algo, incorporating the PoT, PoI, PoP, and PoS in the algo. 

As a temporary fix, and to get the network up and running, we are now using a random method of picking forgers, just like NODE. 



Hate to quote myself, but here is the latest news on Cryptsy:

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/silver-law-group-files-lawsuits-against-cryptocurrency-exchanges-bitcoin-savings-trust-and-cryptsy-2014-10-23


I've always found exchanges to be useless to the ecosystem. Also ridiculously centralized as in one point of error, Mark Karpeles or Moolah.
Peer to peer sounds much better trading from wallet to wallet instead of keeping it on exchanges.

That being said I think any registered exchange in the US is going to be drowning in law suits since what american lawyers can do don't amaze me anymore.
I spell out the impeccable doom for all of them except maybe Coinbase. The rest of US exchanges do best by staying anonymous.
Not to say most of these exchanges are doing something shady.. their own ponzis, ipos, or not caring about customers losing their funds.
They tend to think they'll get away with it because it's "unregulated" but funny thing is that things stay unregulated until they're not anymore and someone always has to be the example.

Isn't C-cex and Bittrex also US exchanges? Expect them to be sued too for anyone who lost funds there. I'm just amazed who would be want to be first on registering an exchange in the US under your own name for cryptocurrencies. People sue Starbuccs if their coffee is too hot, or sue artists for songs they allegedely plagiarized 50 years ago.

Best keep stuff in your wallet nowadays anyway.