Can we please agree though, because this is basic, that you cannot "improve" something, by making it not exist anymore?
Seriously ? No I do not agree.
As a doctor would you rather have a sick patient with a disease that you are able to control rather than a healthy patient ? I guess maybe it makes sense because you can get more money from the patient, is that maybe what you meant ?
OK, I have a sick patient, I should kill him so he is no longer sick? Or should I treat his disease? That is the analogy here. We said "The calculation of the FRR is not optimal, how can we improve it". People have suggested getting rid of it. That is not improving the FRR, that is "killing the patient".
Ok so to continue on the analogy, you have a mass murderer who committed a genocide and plans to commit more, people tell you to not save him, and you decide to make every effort to save him anyway, although the rest of the world would rather not have him on earth ?
We do not want you to improve FRR, we want to get rid of FRR.
*EDIT : I read after your other reply to someone else, and it is clear, the FRR is Ebola, everyone acknowledges it, you could eradicate it, but instead your are trying to get us to help you to make it less dangerous. Well, no thanks.