Judges are not there to arrive at intelligent and informed decisions but they are there to make decisions according to their legal programming. There is a big difference between making decisons and arriving at decisions.
They are like robots trained to judge instead of understanding.
Judges have no education in regard to human behavioral biology or bio-psycho-social factors shaping human behaviour.
They don't have scientific nor technical knowledge.
They are there to enforce the law regardless of what the law says and if it has any coherent and intelligent back up in science and rational.
Just because some judge robot failed to recognise your sociopathic behaviour and socially parasitic attitude and deeds of your comapny doesn't mean that you are correct.
As I said, your constant smileys and cheerful nature in your replies with content lacking any regard and consideration for human beings you have exploited, self evidently proves that you are an utter sociopath.
They are like robots trained to judge instead of understanding.
Judges have no education in regard to human behavioral biology or bio-psycho-social factors shaping human behaviour.
They don't have scientific nor technical knowledge.
They are there to enforce the law regardless of what the law says and if it has any coherent and intelligent back up in science and rational.
Just because some judge robot failed to recognise your sociopathic behaviour and socially parasitic attitude and deeds of your comapny doesn't mean that you are correct.
As I said, your constant smileys and cheerful nature in your replies with content lacking any regard and consideration for human beings you have exploited, self evidently proves that you are an utter sociopath.
The only people trying to exploit this unfortunate situation are the ones demanding windfalls at HF's expense.
Your generic indictments of all judges in general has no applicability to the specific case of HF as overseen by Judge Montali.
If you could be bothered to listen to the hearings, you'd find out he is intelligent, understands the issues presented, and is not a robot.
Spare us the armchair psychology. Such ad hom is a cheap shot of last resort, because you don't have any good argument.
If the judge and I agreed with your position, you wouldn't be forced to substitute insult for analysis by pathologizing disagreement.
Good job awarding yourself the moral high ground. Now please go tell Judge Montali his actions are incoherent and irrational to his face!