51 bitcoins were worth $6800 at the time of purchase, but since they would be worth some other amount when a refund became due, you get more or less btc on a pro rata basis. I'm sorry you are still clinging to an invalid interpretation, even though its been debunked.
There is a good reason no court in the US would ever agree with your interpretation. The reason is that you are a a stupid dumbass trying, but failing, to be cute.
The first board rev used a flawed design, but the chip works fine. You are not using the term 'design flaw' correctly.
This isn't hard. You can understand this.
There is a good reason no court in the US would ever agree with your interpretation. The reason is that you are a a stupid dumbass trying, but failing, to be cute.
The first board rev used a flawed design, but the chip works fine. You are not using the term 'design flaw' correctly.
This isn't hard. You can understand this.
Cara stated clearly in the e-mail. If product doesn't ship you get 51 bitcoins. She never mentioned anything about $6800 or exchange rate or dollar or fiat or anything. Now I don't know why that e-mail didn't held in court but if a company tells me that they will refund 51 bitcoins I expect 51 bitcoins. Note that the statement wasn't "full refund" or anything like that. It was pure 51 bitcoins with no mention whatsoever of the exchange rate.
Does the CS rep have the power to modify the TOS? No, she does not.
Did the CS rep say "you get 51 bitcoins NO MATTER WHAT THE PRICE OF BITCOINS DOES?"
No, she didn't. You should have been intelligent and reasonable enough to understand that the statement was made ceteris parabus.
You can google that phrase if your shitty HS econ teacher didn't teach it to you.
If you think you are right, please take the matter to court. You will find, like pmorici already has, that your interpretation is FOS and won't hold water.
