When you have name calling with accusations your argument seems weak. Presenting evidence with acutal links and an objective view would seem like a better approach.
You know it is extremely distressing to see someone with your background and time in Bitcoin world to be taking any of this crap seriously. It is just not expected and a crying shame.
What evidence are you looking for? Evidence is all laid out and well known. There is a reason no one wants to buy this shitcoin.