Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Spark | X11 | BTer/Bittrex/C-CEX | PoW/PoS | Exchanges | Roadmap |
by
Coinler
on 29/10/2014, 20:21:35 UTC


well, I remember earlz actually pointing at the very same two possible pitfalls in his review...
as we're after pow, part of is not needed anymore anyway. good you fixed that first Smiley
https://github.com/Earlz/coinreviews/blob/master/sparkcoin.txt

when you say, you could would be able to compile the wallet and release a binary, what architecture do you have in mind...?
if you go for windows, that'd be the one with the most demand i guess, we are at most there Smiley

however, later I should have some time to clone this and try getting it compiled with VS on another maschine...
'at most very superficial' would be the most adequate description of my experience on bitcoin-n-clones-code, so to speak...
...yet, seems to be a good time to change that.


I'll do the revised Linux wallet update on my Github fork, dont see much need for a binary of that as most ppl will compile their own anyway. There's documentation on the Github repo for doing a MingW Windows compile so I should be able to do that, depends how many dependencies I have to bodge in to get it working but hopefully I can get it up on Github as a downloadable binary in a few hours.

edschroedinger - since you are already talking to Bittrex makes sense to keep on if you dont mind, I assume its easy for them to pull the timestamp of block 10041 and then see how many txes they processed after that. Just hope its not a lot....

I suspect Bter will be on the majority chain as they had a wallet up early, but if anyone wants to try contacting them please do.

i dont think there will be an issue with txes on their fork as users/pools on their fork would still be able to deposit. it's the users/pools on the good fork who wouldnt have been able to deposit.