Nope. I'm fine. I think the devs are great. I'm telling you about the perception that is festering in some corners of the market. Nothing wrong with answering a few questions (those they can legally answer). When people yell FUD when a legitimate concern is brought up it makes me very nervous.
I'm in the same place you are. I think the devs are fantastic. The festering perception you mentioned is in fact spreading. I get nervous when people yell 'FUD' when basic and relevant questions are asked.
Case numbers are relevant, basic, and public record. It is beginning to unnerve me that the case number has not been given to those who have asked.
-----
@devs, please - what is the case number and why avoid giving the case number when asked, up to now?
Not providing at least the case number seems unusual. Providing it will allay the concerns some people are having about the existence of a true legal matter. There is no valid reason to withhold the case number. Provide that much, and let the 'FUD' about whether the case is fiction or fact be laid to rest.
*Note - in places outside the United States, a case number might be designated by some other term such as 'Docket Number'.
Thank you.
I heard on IRC and Twitter that the devs will release some additional details tomorrow about their legal proceedings. They've stated the new info will answer the questions that have been raised. That sounds positive. Hope we get some good news tomorrow.