It's not a non-issue because it shows lack of serious effort from development team, not to put single feature they are advertising in that wallet, rather they decided to release the simple clone. You have a responsibility to the community, that's what I was trying to explain. It's not the issue if you will walk away with 1M US$ of other people's money and achieve nothing, problem is your failure will make every other attempt of funding the development this way much, much harder. You are not alone on this world, and your potential failure will have serious consequences. Show me on thing that was done about this project that required some effort, pretty graphics doesn't count. That's why the cloning the wallet is an issue, even if it is working as it should.
To this I say:
I personally would not want the dev team to be wasting their time making a better BlockNet wallet. As others have said, BLOCKS are just representative of a stake in the total BlockNet assets. I would rather have them spend time focusing on the XBridge which is how BlockNet tokens are actually going to be useful.
It seems that perhaps you don't understand this project itod. Did you read all of the information?
This is an ITO to collect funds for development of the BLOCKnet. This was all laid out in the documentation available to you.
The code for the XBridge protocol is already underway and, last I heard, the team is considering opening up part of the half-completed source code before the ITO is over.