And please, don't start hiding behind ad hominem accusations.
I'm not hiding or accusing. I just edited it out of your post to demonstrate a good reason why I don't quote you in full.
Just look at the way how you started by suggesting society and charities will emerge to take care of the weaker members of society, and then turn around denying saying so, just because you didn't use the word altruistic. You did that by carefully editing my posts after backing yourself into a corner.
If I came off as saying that absent government
all poor people will be taken care of by private charities that emerge, then I apologize. That was not my intention, but I think my position is now clearer. Throwing a tantrum about my position not being immediately clear and accusing me of doing it intentionally is a bit silly.
How many times have I made "ad hominem" on your person, by your reckoning? Once? Twice?
How many times have you edited my quotes, lifting sentences from middle of paragraphs or avoided responding to questions? Twenty, thirty times?
Your apology is noted, and I also apologize if I have in any way insulted your person. However, your position is still vague.
Further, I have thrown two tantrums among my three hundred odd posts on Bitcointalk - my first one, to Cex.io, and the other, to C-Cex.
If you feel this is a tantrum, then I will try to be more gentle with you.
With that cleared, will you now respond the above so your position will be less vague - without editing my posts?