The code for the HAL anon was done and complete, Dan took it to the next level with a few suggestions. He reviewed not just the anon code, but the code of the coin in it's entirety.
Or.. i legitimately wanted SDC as part of the blocknet.. I paid dan for some work (he has to eat and feed his family too you know) and these guys are fudding.. because it's crypto.. you can take your tin hats off, invest a few bucks into blocknet because it's a real project with real devs and real money backing it.
You keep ignoring the important question:
Is your allegation that Dan Metcalf is the anonymous developer behind Halcyon and that he reviewed his own code, giving you a seemingly legitimate reason to pump Halcyon?
This is what I have deduced is your claim from the chat logs I see here. You are indeed implicating Dan in a lie where he would have had to pretend he was reviewing someone else's code, are you not?
This is serious stuff here. Quit beating around the bush, please and thank you.