If your currency/project can't take a Spoetnik attack, and feels the need to take legal action against him......it's not a very good sign.
If S. is just trolling, then no worries, but he's not the only guy bringing up the red flags, and there is actually some evidence in the form of chatlogs.
This is no longer about the currency but about a legitimate businessman's reputation.
but honestly is that something new here, i dont think so, i watched the fudstorm against syscoin, experienced the sharexcoin-exchange, moolah/mintpal, cryptorush
Whether there is something "new" is not relevant from a legal perspective. Also I don't think those developers were as open about their identities and this is very important.
i saw the war between the cryptonotes and so on, it's nothing new and nothing special, the only real option is to show that the accusations are not true.
Legally morally and practically that is not the only option. The first option is for those who have defamed Dan to either come up with evidence or apologise.
but if they are true i think we are going deeper into the rabbit hole then ever... don't know which will be the results after the waves calm down, but i bought
my popcorn.
cheers
There is not the slightest reason from what we have seen here to believe the rather absurd accusations are true. If there was any real reason we would have seen it by now. What we have seen is a campaign of defamation with no basis in reality, hosted by this site.