I just see pure speculation here He does not refer or name Prometheus anywhere in this post and even if he would if he is just an Investor who cares? the fact that he will have any say in the Util dev plan is pure speculation.
Still no Evidence here.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=797900.msg9399112#msg9399112If you look at the context of that post in the UTIL thread it is pretty clear that Prometheus is the investor being referenced in that post.
Investing BTC into a project to fund its development is far different than investing in a project by buying its coins. I wouldn't say he is 'just an investor'. He is a financier. There's a big difference.
Pure ignorance...
yeah, let's not unite the coins, lets make separate coins over and over again, and play the same P&D game over and over again.
There it is, anon is no more a hype. What's next.
GTFO! BlockNet is trying to achieve something good for the Altcoin world. But you plain stupid, so you can't understand that.
Your posts on this forum quite often exemplify ignorance, qawzsx. The only thing you seem capable of doing is calling others ignorant and yelling GTFO!
BlockNET is a great project, yes, and it has the potential to enhance the world we live in. I am very excited about the project.
But that's not the debate that I am trying to have here. I am trying to determine the nature of the relationship between Dan Metcalf and Prometheus, between BlockNet and Prometheus.
Prometheus has a reputation for financing a coin's development such that the price rises to a satisfiable level for him to profitably cash out and crash the market such that interest is lost in that coin...and then he moves on.
As someone who has been holding XC since May and as someone who has purchased BLOCK, I would like to objectively understand the Dan-Prometheus connection.
This does not in any way make me ignorant. It makes me an active participant seeking an objective understanding of the dynamics at play with my investment.