It's out of my hands now as it's been sent to DigiByte to use as they see fit. Perhaps you might send them a PM offering your services.
I think it should be relatively easy to clean up (a few AV products generate alerts for the Windows exe, for example) and turn into something DigiByte official (giving credit to previous developers of course).
It's by far and away the most profitable way to mine DGB.
Groestl beats out qubit in profitability? I thought pools like boostpool.com were inflating the Groestl difficulty enough that it was harder to get normalized payouts.
I tried everything
qubit is best for my hd 7xxx: 7970 7950 7850 7790
cold and less diff
and more profit
and all of this perfectly clear here:
https://dgb-qubit.theblocksfactory.com
Qubit is a distant second, and, even though electrical usage is more or less the same, my cards heat up much more than with groestl. All things considered, groestl is the clear winner in my opinion. How do your Qubit proceeds match the Groestl proceeds depicted below?
57 Day Chart - DGB (and BTC equivalent) Daily Mining Proceeds for each 1 MH/s
Check out how your BTC equivalent proceeds have stayed constant for a variety of reasons, but mainly because as price falls, mining falls, and difficulty falls, giving the miner more DGB rewards, and thusly keeping the BTC equivalent steady. Interesting observation I thought.
It's also always at the top of the list at http://www.whattomine.com/ . Qubit gives Skein a close run for that distant second.