So Dan was lying multiple times trying to cover up yesterday but now he's decided to come clean??? So everything is true basically???
Rather than babble on with a long post short on facts can you succinctly state what lie was told by Dan. It's not clear at all from you OP, which goes on and on and on without actually stating what you think was a lie.
Just state it simply.
1.Dan said this........................
2. I think that is a lie because.......................
1.Dan said this........................
Dan said he wasn't involved with Halcyon:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg9395251#msg9395251I'm sorry, I wasn't clear the first time, I am not the halc dev nor did I write any of its code. We should subpoena the forum server logs and get the IP's.. That is completely absurd that I am the halc dev.
Keep in mind that he was paid to do an "unbiased" code review to pump Halcyon.
He also denied it in other posts I can dig up later.
2. I think that is a lie because.......................
Dan and Prometheus' statements today confirmed that Dan did in fact work with Prometethus on Halcyon.
Dan now claims that his involvement with Halcyon was "public knowledge":
1.Dan said this........................
I wanted to make a clear and concise statement about all of this mud slinging going around....
As everybody involved with XC's knows I did numerous freelance projects, some of which Prometheus was involved in, like KeyOS and Halc. Yesterday I was so frustrated with everything that was ALREADY PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE [stated on twitter and in the XC OP/ANN] being portrayed as some type of scam..
2. I think that is a lie because.......................
He wasn't publicly known to be behind Halcyon by anyone other than "inner circle" people.
Especially the fact that he did one of those pump and dump code reviews for them under false pretenses. How do you defend him being involved in such activities?