Sorry but the voting results where like this :
Keep btctalk 53.9%
Keep it as is - 28 (44.4%)
Close it and start a new btctalk thread - 6 (9.5%)
End btctalk 46%
End it with link to new forum - 17 (27%)
Delete it and link to new forum - 12 (19%)
SO why make a voting, if they have decieded to close it anyways.
The majority voted for having a btctalk thread and leave the old one open.
You cannnot count " Close it and start a new btctalk thread " to "End btctalk" this is a contradiction.
So the majority voted to keep an
unmoderated thread here in Bitcontalk and EffectsToCause interpreted this as the vote for closing it down forever. After all he is a scientists so he can twist the data to suit it for his own agenda.
The VRC team couldn't even manage to carry out with integrity a simple community voting ... that's great ... that's what VeriCoin became, a corrupted process.
I am glad I didn't even take part in their voting circus. I was sure it will be shamble even I couldn't imagine how a simple community voting can be corrupted, but never mind, EffectsToCause could manage that.