Re: CoinsSource influenced by SDC pump'n'dump group! Evidence inside.
LOL, next!
At best that might defend his XST article but doesn't refute the rest of my post.
1. Use your real account name instead of being a bitchmade troll. Doesn't add much credibility to your cause when you hide behind a newbie account. I have no relationship with Aleppo and Soepkip handled that article not me. If you had any reading comprehension you would see that the interview was with the SDC community manager.
2. There is a massive issue in crypto news today of journalists not doing their research before publishing an article. This particular journalist, Aleppo, wrote an article on the stealthcoin peer review and dismissed the findings from the bitcoin core dev as "fud" instead of technical review of the claims made in their whitepaper. I called him out on Twitter for lacking integrity https://twitter.com/AleppoCF/status/521214689490251776
3.When the Stealthcoin dev posted a thank you to longandshort for the research and peer review.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=681725.msg9182120#msg9182120
"Again I would like to thank those who have pointed out publicly a critical deficiency in Chandran signatures as they apply to crypto-currencies [1]. Namely, the deficiency is that Chandran signatures are untraceable. I would especially like to mention that LongAndShort's relentless research into the matter was impressive and genuinely helpful." Hondo (XST Lead Developer)
4.There is another massive issue in crypto with people like you making allegations without any "evidence" to base it off of other than your tin foil hat bullshit. "Oh they follow each other on Twitter" LMAO. SDC has nothing to do with CoinSource and neither does anyone in the community.
Why don't you focus on the real scams in crypto like for example the BitSwift developer aka Coinada aka Bitcad4u (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=134027) who is BobSurplus's right hand man. The reason all the Blocknet info came out was based on a communication between a known pumper "Coinada" (BitSwift Dev) who happened to send a communication to MrBoh confirming that Dan Metcalf was the anon developer for HAL. 5.Why don't you target the journalists that have written stories on that?
"thought some of you here would find this interesting considering Dan gave XST the stellar review"
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=681725.msg8806666#msg8806666
translation? paid review to justify their stealthcoin pump
6.What's even funnier is the bullshit SDC fud thread which was started by the LXC dev. Here we have a case of 2 developers (LXC + SWIFT) busy scamming and scheming the crypto community. I would not be surprised if you were Coinada using a bitchmade account to throw out allegations to cover your own ass. More than likely you're one of TrangLee's shill accounts a known sockpuppet of Bob's pump and dump group.
PoopieLaxitive31 = KidCrypto the developer of LXC who started that thread.
That entire thread was created by the developer of Librexcoin
Logs: https://www.zerobin.net/?99c41ace76ffa3b9#TjWWhWizGfsmYsNr2AWtcRpUHeNQuyh18udJ1t+h01c=
My full response to their fud: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=818939.msg9416289#msg9416289
7.Bottom line is you are just as guilty of scamming as those pump groups and you are no doubt in league with them.
This is the last communication I'll make on this thread. I've got far better things to do than entertain your bitchmade tin foil hat conspiracy.
1. At least look at my post history if you're going to accuse me of hiding behind a fake account. For a start, my account was created over a month ago long before SDC orchestrated a full blown fud-attack on Blocknet, XC and Dan Metcalf. And my post history is full of support of XC and Blocknet. I lurked these forums for a couple months before joining. This is stated in my post history. So how exactly is this a 'bitchmade troll' account?
2. You stated that Aleppo's XST article lacks integrity. Fair enough. But that exchange occurred on 10th October. Perhaps this is when you reached out to him about becoming your socket puppet. Possibly in exchange for inside knowledge of when you plan to dump your SDC because at this point his interest in SDC is obvious from his articles. Or maybe he's just on the payroll. In fact just 2 days after you questioning his integrity he publishes an article whereby he defends the actions of the SDC trolls (which includes you) in your smear campaign against XST. The timing is astonishing. Why was he chosen to write it if you apparently questioned his integrity?
3. Your next point is about the "fud" surrounding XST which you guys deny. Honestly I don't know enough about the ins n outs to comment on that. My interests lie with XC and Blocknet.
4. My point about you following each other on Twitter is just one piece of the puzzle. There are many allegations and evidence against you being one of the main perpetrators in this smear campaign against blocknet, XC and Dan. So the guy who happens to follow you on Twitter, and vice-versa, just so happens to be the author of this disgraceful article against Dan and Blocknet? Bare in mind that this journalist follows approx 10 or so traders out of thousands around so you gotta admit it's a crazy "coincidence". At the end of the day he has published so much stuff linked to your agenda. What's the deal with you 2? why do you follow him, he tweets fuck all.
5. Can you point me to those articles? I honestly haven't seen them.
6. First I'm coinada and now I'm tranglee? Would you like to add anymore people to that list? Sounds like we have matching tin-foil hats. Check my post history before coming out with these accusations.
7. Dude, you claim that I'm making baseless allegations when your post is full of them. I'm actually proud of myself for coming across as this super-involved pumper because I'm actually quite new to the scene.
I followed the XC and Blocknet threads exclusively from June til this smear campaign emerged. Good night sir. Will return tomorrow to check for updates.