but scZC is MM'd and direct mined for security alongside the scBTC. therefore it is more secure than today's altcoins. sure, the exchange price for scZC might be volatile as are altcoins today but b/c it has the advantage of being MM'd and direct mined as a result of scBTC being attracted to this SC for the same perfect anonymity reasons, it should do better than today's altcoins.
No, the sidecoin is only MM if there is value in it. The comparison to Bitcoin is asinine. Bitcoin had no competition. There was no choice for miners or better use of their resource
we have plenty of altcoin examples that are being mined today. why is it hard to envision scZC being mined? answer: it's not.
Bitcoin started of at $0. "there was no incentive to mine them" yet they were. once they were bought and traded, price started to rise. scZC only has to be mined by its dev to get things going.
If it's only mined by its dev than it make it a HUGE security risk. Exactly like any other altcoins. Again, no one wants to store their value on extremely volatile sidecoins that are considerably more risky, less secure and have no distinct feature.
not if the dev doesn't do a premine and just mines like Satoshi did to get it going. why is this so hard to comprehend?
the scBTC have no every reason to store on scZC b/c of the risk free put.
there is no risk free put on the scZC
who said there was? it's only on the scBTC which is why they will moved to the ZC SC in the first place; to get anonymity.