It's funny, the line of defense from the start of all this up until now have been:
1. Those skype screenshots are fake. Dan is not working with Prom nor is he the dev of Hal.
2. When the screenshots were confirmed to be true, the defense turned into: Oh, Dan must of have not known that he was engaging in unethical behavior
3. And now you're saying that all evidence were hearsay anyway
What's going to be the next defense now that I've explained why the evidence is not just hearsay?
The defense, as in Dan Metcalf's defense, has always been that he did no coding on HAL.
Dan's defense has never been any of the things you stated above.
In other words you are ignoring Dan Metcalf's own defense.
Here Dan explains his position. You need to deal with that.
http://www.coinssource.com/interview-with-dan-metcalf-regarding-recent-blocknet-concerns/