If you started 350 days ago I really can't be arsed to calculate it, but either way you're clearly full of shit even if you only started with 0.01 btc or a few satoshis.
Which obviously means he has
0BTC. Pretty easy to double 0BTC everyday now ain't it.

Yeah, but is it possible to sell 0 btc to buy 0 xrp?
Pretty sure that just makes him full of shit, if he's claiming to have something and double it daily but really has zero, it's not clever semantics, it's bullshit.
Well I thought it was funny....
I assume that 95-99% of this forum would not have heard of bitcoin if the emission would have been infinite from the beginning. satoshis incentive design for bitcoin is from an economics perspective the schumpeterian wet dream for raising awareness for an invention.
For all I know, computer types were first attracted to bitcoin for the pleasure of helping to test a smart solution to an old technical problem. Then libertarians got interested because they saw in bitcoin a way to build an economy independent of government and banks. Then drug users and sellers adopted it as a way to pay for drugs without the DEA knowledge (so they thought). At some point, others noticed the value going up like crazy, and bought into it as a get-filthy-rich-quick scheme.
I suspect that a majority of the people in this forum are from the latter group. The finite supply of bitcoins is important only for that group, because it is part of the argument that "proves" that the price will be astronomical one day. But it is not essential, even to them; that argument would have been only a little less convincing if the supply was programmed to increase 5%/year, forever. So much so, that they are not bothered by the current 5-10% inflation rate.
If you see the quote about bank bailouts in the genesis block, then clearly satoshi has political/ economical motives. I strongly disagree about the finite supply being only important for the late speculators as well.