Its pretty exhausting because it is difficult to determine what you are trying to communicate.
This post in particular is merely self contradictory rhetoric. It doesn't contain any reasoned arguments.
Parse it yourself and you will see...
Either (a) side chains have no capability to "mess with" Bitcoin, or (b) they are empowered to improve, ensure preservation, and adaptability...
Then, you claim to know the purpose of side chains. As if there is only one purpose that *the people* that create side chains can have. This is an outlandishly impossible claim to make.
Followed by another self contradiction. Either (a) side chains do not change the incentive structure, or (b) they improve it. Both of these can not be true.
I think you should just stop advocating for side chains. You are a bad spokesperson for the cause. People will read these posts of yours and get the idea that someone is hyping SC for some nefarious purpose, because these posts of yours just don't make sense, and not even internally consistent with itself.
And yes, of course I can proclaim to know the purpose of sidechain.
It is perfectly obvious to anyone who has taken some time to study them and observe what they enable and what they don't. It is simple deduction using the premise that altcoins existed before sidechains therefore sidechains did not come about to enable altcoins.