its a shame that we as community cant take the time to discuss this properly with more details and more time
now we have talked it over in like 10 minutes and brushed it away. I'm not saying i'm for or against the proposal
but i would have liked more time to discuss it.
There was nothing to discuss. The second you talk about implementing a superblock, the discussion is off. Crypto isn't that. Period.
But what is the difference between superblock and reducing number of emitted DRKs per year dynamically at one point?
Steal from the future to pay for the present. So miners and masternode holders would receive 'less' coin. On the flip side, they might end up with 'more' in terms of fiat value, functionality, etc.
But we already did that once right?
Also changed block reward calculation DGW?
I still dont see difference?