1) Dan drained the XC premine
Quote
2) Dan has been consistently deceptive. If you honestly think that he doesn't frequently bend the truth and dodge legit questions then you're being willfully ignorant.
What more proof do we need? 
Quote
3) Dan deceived at best and lied at worst when directly asked if he had involvement in HAL by claiming he had no role in the development despite Promethus saying that Dan helped develop their anon. Even if Dan didn't physically write any code, he was involved in the development. It was confirmed by Prometheus that he was involved with more than just a code review.
Dan said he didn't write any code but admitted he looked at the code. No problems here.Quote
His wording has consistently been deceptive. It is unethical period. Please explain how that is not unethical.
Because you claiming things are unethical doesn't make them so. Quote
Dan doing a code review under the pretense of being an unbiased third party to lure unsuspecting investors in to a Prometheus pump and dump is the epitome of unethical behavior. How is could it not be?
You have no evidence Dan "lured" anyone. That is your fantasy.