You are talking non-sense. If there is some kind of explanation regarding the set up of a society without government, then surely that can be explained rather than asserting that you have some obscure knowledge that solves everything, but such knowledge is at too high of a level to take the time to explain.
The big secret is this:
"Never was there a government that was not composed of liars, malefactors and thieves." - Marcus Tullius Cicero
Now feel free to keep believing in the great gifts from your democratically representative and economically interventionist state, but my advice is to leave a way out to who wants to opt out of it. Or large-scale violence will start at some point as usual.
I deny that any burden lies upon me to argue in favor of any government. Part of my point, in challenging the claims of Rptiella is that he made the claims, more or less, that we can have a world without government and taxes without asserting an alternative vision. In essence, he asserted, without substantiation, that all the various services of the tax dollars are wasted and we can just do away with such. The burden is NOT on me to substantiate any claims, b/c I am NOT making claims, the burden, from my viewpoint, is on the person making the claims to substantiate them to some extent or to refrain engaging in such pie in the sky assertions.
Currently, I am of the believe that government is way to intertwined in a lot of ways in the lives of many people, and there would need to be a transition out of government and into some kind of alternative society. You cannot just throw it all out, as some of these nut job get rid of government claims attempt to assert.