Lol, so you're on the side that thinks Dan is the super coder HAL dev as well as the XC dev? Hold on one second, let me find for you a troll that thinks Dan can't code. It would make for such an interesting debate. It would be like two retards fighting. And I find it ironic that you are calling us naive, chances are 99% of you haven't followed XC's development at all and are just regurgitating the same bullshit that other trolls began to speculate about. Not only that but going forward with the XC FUD would also seem to better your investment in SuperNET right. It's always a good thing to make your only major competitor look like a scam, deceiful, shaddy, that way you can capitalize. It's not surprising that the 3 major groups that are trolling XC are Super, SDC and DRK.
Super is a direct competitor and anything said to hurt block is useful for your sake. I even recall the BTCD dev tried to make a persuasive post claiming that BlockNET was in fact a scam and that SuperNET was not. Good job at marketing your project fuckface.
SDC has a terrible track record for trolling other coins that may appear to offer better technology or that will hurt profits for the few bagholders, this makes it the 5th time with XC. There is a 35 page thread that proves this as well on the main page.
DRK has always had a hateful relationship with XC. It was so bad that Evan and Dan had to make a joint statement to call off the FUD wars. It is not the least bit surprising to see some DRK fanboys taking shots at XC during this smear campaign.
Yes, I am invested in SuperNET. I've never tried to hide that. But no, I do not feel that Blocknet is a threat. As far as I'm concerned, it's not even a competition.
And yes, I actually have been following XC's development for quite some time. If you look at my post history, you can see that I used to be involved with Keycoin, which Dan also code reviewed. This is how I first heard about Dan and XC. However, after discovering that there were some odd things surrounding it, I followed my gut and decided to end my support for Keycoin.
Instead of constantly using the defense that "competitors are just out to FUD" (which is a rather weak defense btw), why not analyze some of the information that we actually have. There's obviously a lot of things going on at once, so let's simplify it and look at one thing at a time. Since adhitthana has not been able to respond to this, maybe you can:
Skype screenshot with Prom saying that Dan "was the anon dev for HAL" (
http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#2)
HAL code review (
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=741728.msg8723167;topicseen#msg8723167)
What do you think this means and what are the implications?