Everything that was posted is very concerning, but to me stops short of scamming. Rather, i'd like to use the word scummy instead since Dan associates with prom.
Thanks for you input. I'm curious, would you consider Dan doing a "code review" of Hal's anon code while giving the impression that he was an unbiased third party scammy or scummy?
As references, here is the skype screenshot (
http://imgur.com/a/1xbWq#2) and here is the code review (
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=741728.msg8723167;topicseen#msg8723167)
It really depends on a few factors such as was he paid, directly by someone or indirectly by building up trust for a pump and dump.