Thanks. Much appreciated.

It's gonna be really simple around here. I suppose it should always have been:

There's just insufficient reason to allow claims against the Blocknet's legitimacy a place unless they have real backing.


Above all I prize constructive criticism. Almost nothing else can help to spot weaknesses and blind spots in the ideas behind a project. There were some very rewarding moments in the first 30-odd pages of this thread. People had real questions and expressed them frankly and without emotively loaded terms (e.g. most FUD) and/or overextended hypotheses (e.g. Leewilson).

I'm well trained in rhetoric and can spot it a mile away. Fudsters, you'll not fool me, and I'll not be tolerant.

But genuine, hard questions are very welcome here.