so by avoiding the question, i can only conclude you agree with me, they are in fact different ledgers.
and as a result, you move your goalposts once again and say a fool will be a fool, which in fact has been my argument all along.
yes they are different ledger deriving their monetary unit from one main ledger. their ledger are effectively sub ledgers within the main ledger. is there something you don't understand in there?
what does this have to do with malicious schemes causing people to lose money anyway?
ok, let me ask you again. this time answer.
what honest, immutable ledger allows part of itself to be cut off permanently from its main database, not to mention the fact that
it may not even know about it?