I can honestly say I do not support your methods.
So let me please get to why.
Well, I see I struck a nerve here...
You did strike a nerve and for someone with a sense of ethical and honorable behavior, it should be apparent why. But for the newbies who are reading this post (and for you if you really have that much of a problem with comprehending such simple things), I will explain why.
Many people in this community have sacrificed a great deal to bring this opportunity to crypto as a whole. They hoped that people like you would be able to build awesome things with the toolkit, but also expected that if the risks they personally took for everyone paid off that there would be honorable and ethical devs who cared enough to give back as a /bow and /thank you for their risks making it possible to outcompete all other, similar technologies.
Somehow you saw fit to not only fall short of reaching the social consensus--you also found a way to completely ignore it. Never did you make a post telling the community of your intentions to do this in bitsharestalk.org forums...you simply did a complete end-around us in hopes that you could gain from others' risks. To a degree, this would be fine with me as I am not personally in this to get fabulously wealthy, but it does tend to sadden me and dim my outlook for humanity that someone is so obviously bent on getting wealthy off a product someone else built without so much as a
pittance of thanks. This, to me, speaks volumes about the character of those who are working on this project.
If I am a potential investor, I am wondering why you wouldn't throw me under the bus at the first chance too. We have plenty of pump and dump schemes out there...and you officially made yours look like one. If you can't trust the dev to act with a modicum of respect for others, what exactly makes you want to invest in their project (which is directly tied to them)?
Forking BitShares code without mentioning BitShares explicitly even once, -8 points.First, I want to assure you that I would rather have your support than your animosity. I'm not trying to antagonize anyone here.
I am glad that you outwardly express that you wish no animosity, but sadly your actions speak much louder. If you really want this to change...change your actions

This is specifically what bothers me most: Nowhere do I see a symbol that says
"Powered by Bitshares". You seem to think that saying "
it is no secret we are cloning btsx" on a post somewhere buried deep in bitcointalk is an acceptable retort...
It is a mystery to me how you can be so blatantly ignorant to what most people learn in middle school. Even creative commons material openly references those whose content is featured, giving the due respect to those who selflessly created their content for open source use. Take a moment and imagine yourself in everyone's shoes.
No...you do not need to go into depth on the kickstarter page about bitshares. In fact, I would imagine you would do this in a way that buries it further under walls of text that no user will ever use. From your behavior thus far, it is a fair assumption that this would be your path of choice anyway.
However, you could easily at least quell animosity (which you openly state you want to do) by putting the "Powered by Bitshares" logo legibly on your logo so people can see who did the hard work so you could get your pay day, and do their own research into what BitShares is.Instead, you somehow seem to find a way to act as though you are ignorant to these obvious details...
Please man...just FIX it. You wont get the support or help (in any direct way) from the community...but at least you will help quell the animosity.