Alright Evan, would you mind recap what the proposal is so far?
Also I think a Pay per Darksend process is better than for a period of time, but it's the source of the issue, right?
Yeah, it's the source.
The Proposal:
Hardfork the network to provide completely zero-fee darksend mixing. However, when users start they'll pay a "subscription". When mixing on a masternode, they provide proof they own that subscription and the masternode will allow them to mix. After mixing, only masternodes are capable of transmitting these zero-fee transactions to the network by signing them, and they are restricted to only send 1 a day (some calculation based off the total amount of masternodes).
Subscriptions could come in day/month/yearly forms.
Edit: I've got to run! We'll continue this later
When you become a member of something, you have different set of rights and protections. There are terms and conditions....which brings in regulators - potentially.