paranoia. You started this war. If it turns out you made that shit up about Murck - you need to be severely dealt with. I say you have 24 hours to produce legitimate evidence - or that which they have planned for you and your family was well deserved. I'll even send them money if someone posts a bitcoin address to support their counterattack on you and your family. This isn't the first time you came around here yelling "Pedophile". If it is not true, you are way overdue for being shut down.
Dude, WTF? You may have a point about reckless accusations, but I didn't see Phin even mentioning Murck's family.
Murck has no time at all to waste doing a lawsuit against a psycho. That is very time consuming and he is busy doing actual work which actually produces some good effect on the system.
Just out of curiosity, can you give some examples of such "actual work"?
People who suggest we allow Bruno to remain in the community can expect a community of high disorder and chaos and lawlessness. While so many of the bitcoin community love the stupid notion of anarchy - it is merely because they don't really get what that is.
Or could it be you who doesn't really get what it is?
Please stop defending this asshole, stop accepting such horrible behavior, and stop Bruno from ruining the lives of those at the very head of the effort to make bitcoin a great system for all.
Your behavior is worse than Bruno's, as I point out above. False accusations do not ruin lives (unless the state becomes involved). Anyone can post anything about anyone on the Internet. That's a fact that you have to deal with, regardless of much you may fear non-conformance to arbitrary rules (disorder/"chaos"). And you need to prove your contention that Murck is "at the very head of the effort to make bitcoin a great system for all".
I still haven't seen any retraction nor apology which is where we all should start the path to putting this behind us. Bruno is the lowest form of scum and isn't going to get off this charge by saying: 'they are trying to kill my family". That is just more bullshit on top of the other bullshit.
You are assuming that he doesn't have the evidence he claims he has, which he says he has now handed over to "the appropriate authorities".
We all have skin in this game. Murck is a highly educated guy sitting in the top seat of the effort to advance Bitcoin's cause before the eyes of all of government. Kicking that guy in the face is a very bad idea. I don't give a shit about him personally, but he is presently in a position to do the most good for bitcoin.
So you want Bitcoin to be approved by "government", I see. Clearly you don't understand what decentralization means (nor what "government" is). You're an obedient order-follower without conscience, correct?
Censorship is never prudent - it is always corrupt. Let people have their say. Don't try to control what others think or say.
LOL. Comments like these are so cute and naive. You've obviously never had to manage a large number of human beings before. Painfully obvious.
Its so funny how people like yourself think that only people in power are corrupt. Its not possible that the myriads of regular people can't also be just as insanely corrupt, and in need of boundaries.
I can only wish upon you the curse of having to manage a large community of people yourself. So you get to deal with being subjected to the insanity, tinfoil hats, unfounded paranoias, suspicions, and outright lying that comes from the "sheeples".
-B-
So you're saying that censorship is necessary to keep the "sheeples" in line, so that you can "manage" large numbers of them, so that you can feel superior to your fellow human beings. How cute.