It's actually illegal to do that with things like stocks on investment discussion forums.
So if GM spends all their money without accounting for it and I have invested in Ford (or I'm just a "troll") and I start bringing the subject up with an Internet account (and I have several) the SEC will be more concerned with me than GM not accounting for their funds?
Yeah no. Not how it works. Free speech and all ... law is concerned about people who take other people's money ... not "trolls" (I'm still waiting on evidence that I am one)evidence?!?
so your a troll, not being concerned by law.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=trolling&defid=4250942goto: 'Signs that your trolling is unsuccesful'
EDIT: i don't need evidence you're a troll. prove that your not by providing previous posts of you that imply that your not.
I don't consider myself a troll and haven't seen anyone point out specific trollish behavior.
But if you want to say anything negative about xc is trolling based on the market cap I would say negative information has been more than successful.
Crashing the price wasn't strict my mission. Introducing inconvenient truth tends to do that though.
No, if you're a community member saying something negative about development, marketing or what not, is just fine because it's intended to help the team to improve, and potentially make better decisions.
For what I can tell you are not interested in improving anything, you clearly have a different agenda, and answers to your questions here are not relevant to anybody except yourself and maybe some other trolls.
You haven't provided prove that you're interested in this project until now, and to be honest I don't expect you are going to.
Therefor you are just a troll. Unsuccessful troll by definition because no one cares about your 'critical' questions. They have been answered some time ago anyway.