Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] [NAUT] Nautiluscoin - First Coin w/Stabilization Fund - Digishield
by
barabbas
on 18/11/2014, 18:30:08 UTC
Developer Status:
There is one, confirmed by BK, and jyap contacted me directly to tell me he's working on it with a friend (read up).

BK has not disappeared just really busy, he's still active on Twitter, and he's now promoting his book, "Bitcoin Big Bang". Plus he's had more non-virtual-currencies appearances on CNBC and other places as well because we're in the fourth quarter, pretty much every business everywhere is scrambling to get their year-end stuff in order.

Also I don't blame him for coming around here; honestly if I wasn't given the "Community Manager" title I probably wouldn't be here either based on the kinds of attitudes a lot of these posts are, it's a huge headache.

BK has been burned too many times giving estimates that others could not fulfill, so, no estimates are given at all anymore, and they probably never will be. Basically bad situations by series of bad eggs, but it's definitely getting turned around.

There's no excuse for BK not coming here, and, however briefly, update the community and otherwise assuming responsibility for the current situation of the coin. He's not responsible for the price but he indeed is for the "bad apples" that HE CHOSE.

By the way, this jyap guy, he's paid. Make that abundantly clear. He's in it for the money, not for the good of NAUT. Right?

why should BK come here really?  what obligation does he have to anyone here?  really?  he owes nobody here anything. bk doesn't even own the coin.

anyone who is taking a ride with naut should be aware of this.

iconic expert seems to be doing a great  job of notifying bytecent investors of updates. perhaps I should buy his coin? Smiley


Perhaps you should. And you could sell it for a huge profit already.

BK has indeed and ETHICAL obligation to the many people that invested in NAUT, which is HIS coin. And yes, he OWES every single investor ata least an explanation as to why projects started months ago have not come to happen yet.

Ethical maybe, but it's fairly naive to rely on the ethics of a relative stranger when it comes to crypto investments.  I've only ever seen a few posts and his appearances on TV.  

An explanation would be useful I guess but he obvs has other things going on or an agenda we don't know about.  I'm going with the latter.








He is far from a stranger, he's a celebrity, a public persona. And, as a consequence, he has certain implied obligations that other people don't have. Not necessarily legaly, for now, but in many other ways. His book sales, for instance, will suffer greatly if his unethical and/or inept behavior in crypto produces a backlash. It could even threaten his position as a CNBC contributor... and, definitely, affect BK Capital and its employees. It is just irresponsible. And such behavior can potentially come with a huge negative repercussion.