I think you are missing the fact, that Maidsafe and Ethereum IPOs were in different times. With BITTREX volume ~3000 BTC and before MintPal fell in a pit.
How many more pages of "here is an idea , lets put it on an exchange for 5 days"
"you can't do that it completely ignores berg stake one of the main features of the coin, it doesn't make sense"
"i will offer no solution what soever to what has just been said, here is my idea :but lets put it on an exchange for 5 days"
It is quite feasible, all you will need, it's to replace real bergstake with tokens. People will buy tokens and in the end redeem them for breakoutcoin with bergstake.
They were at different times? what does this have anything to do with it? are we talking about 2 IPO's here or just 1? how are you comparing this coin to another IPO coin that doesn't exist?
Alt coins are at an all time low in volume, it doesn't mean funds are non existent , it means people are not trading their coins. Because they are sick of getting scammed, but it has been proven that if the coin is good enough, it will gain a decent amount from an IPO in exchange or not.
When ethereum was for sale bitcoin was going crazy, loads of people screaming and crying that bitcoin was dying, then ethereum made tens of thousands of bitcoin, ooooo where did this magical bitcoin come from?

i thought it wasn't traded, let's also take into account the fact they fucked the market up a week later selling 5000 of those coins for dollar over a short duration of time
also you saying feasible when you don't have to lift a single finger is pretty funny , you have to coordinate between the exchange and breakout coin, having to sell tokens to over 300 people then attaching their names to their accounts and somehow proving that the address they give out is connected to the address from bittrex/bter without anyone getting scammed , all while this exchange that has better things to do has to go out of their way to spend more than a few days having to sort all that shit out
even with a token system like counterparty you are still creating even more time wasted , with a team that should be soley focused on delivery of a feature filled casino which is already taking longer than previously quoted considering we aint even seen anything yet
But honestly thanks for offering other ideas other than the same thing said over the last few pages just slightly different, If there is something good i will agree with it, but if it's just creating more messing around, more fussed, more chances of mistakes and mess ups, with so much more time wasted , while not actually being a real solution because it will have to still be fundraised privately most likely at the current prices, i cannot agree with