do a transaction and try to figure out the source, it is not difficult.
Isnt this the definition of not anon? Hoping you meant 'it is difficult'
The system uses random nodes to create multisig address, so when there are enough participating nodes, you will not be able to pinpoint the source.
Or is this to say that when the supercoin network is large enough, the level of pseudoanonymity will be heightened. More potential random mixing nodes = higher difficulty in discerning sender.
For the 1st thing I think supercoindev meant "it is not difficult to try a transaction and see whether you can find its source"
For the 2nd, it is not easy to see the re-used multisig address, if the network is big enough. The supercoin transaction to the destination is sent through an address by mixer which does not even participate in the generation of the multisig address, therefore it is simply impossible to trace the source, as the mixer received his coins from a different one that participate the multisig address.
For those who claimed that supercoin does not support anonymous transaction, I am 100% sure that they understand nothing about the code, nor do they understand the white papers.
i said it wasnt anon and was just mixing very well instead. i fully understand the code and his use of the message command system.