If you're trying to scare serious investors away from this your going the right way about it.

If all you want is a whoo-ha thread with feel good factor where most of a coin's valuation derives from mutually induced hysteria then I suggest you go and take a stroll through the graveyards of bitcointalk.org [ANN] threads and feast your eyes on the associated mind boggling projections for valuations.

I think crypto has moved on from there myself.

We've had over a year and a half of significant alt launches reaching huge marketcaps and then dying without ever gaining any significant adoption. It's been an exercise in fiat accumulation for the most part fed by a willing supply of clowns who jump on bandwagons as soon as a few buzzwords are waved in front of their face.

Projects like this one do actually stand a chance of breaking that duck and it does posses some promising qualities. But it won't go anywhere if it's just a spectator sport - a day at the races where your horse either came in or didn't. That's why I asked you how many of these ventures you've been involved in (which I noticed you didn't answer) because there is now quite a large population of investors with a good track record of watching how cryptocurrency projects grow, blossom and die. They don't need to see another "feel good factor" [ANN] thread. They know the scams, have ridden the highs and been dumped in the moat enough times now to do more than scratch the surface of an investment prospect before they sink their hard earned BTC into it.

If this is to go even to a cap of $5m then many of those will have to be interested. They'll also be "whale pumpers" who will jump on significant bits of news and pump the thing to kingdom come only to take profits at the top and dump it to oblivion.

The only resistance to that kind of thing killing the coin is long term fundamental commercial viability, so I suggest you support in any efforts to start establishing what that viability is.