Re: [SafeDICE.com] 0.5% House Edge - Fast Bet/Deposit/Withdraw - True Provably Fair
Shutting down investments was stupid as hell. The only benefit to using your site if there is a variable edge is if the bankroll is enough to which you can bet up to / to win 20 BTC per roll and have an edge of 1% or less. The current leader is PrimeDice which offers 1% house edge fixed and offers ability to win up to 20 BTC per roll. Thus, the variable edge doesn't matter with your site unless you build a big enough bankroll because anyone who wants to bet a lot is simply going to go a more trusted site that offers higher payouts.
Dumb, dumb, dumb move on your part.
Dumb, dumb, dumb move on your part.
You post comes across as unnecessarily angry and misinformed. I don't think any of your points are really valid:
People are understandably suspicious of "yet another new investment dice site" after the recent scams we have seen. Showing a willingness to downplay the "investment" side of their site may be a good move in terms of building trust. It suggests that they aren't all about building a big bankroll to steal, and was probably a good move for them at this point.
The benefit of using safedice over other dice sites is that their house edge is lower if you aim to win 0.5% of their bankroll or less. Most dice players make those kinds of bets all the time. Bigger bets are relatively rare, and so for the average player safedice's odds are significantly better than the competitions.
PrimeDice's limit is a 20 BTC payout, so that's a 10 BTC profit at 2x. bitdice.me has something like a 40 BTC max profit and do is the "current leader" if your ordering by max profit. I think safedice's variable house edge is quite clever. The low house edge could attract players who otherwise would play somewhere else, and as they increase their stakes maybe they'll stay because the like the design, or just because of inertia.
We dont know why are you so mad at our decision. We had the feature, but people seems to be against it. Stunna is just an example, therere lot of other people against the investment feature. So we take the advise from the community and disabled it. Wed be happy to reopen it, but if people dont like it, wed better find another solution.
^^^ You don't see that Dooglus is focusing on this site again? He's been trialing it harder then any other site and been giving a lot of feedback. He has interest. He even invested in it and showed everyone he did, whether it be for a minute or not, Dooglus kept a balance on the site. He showed indirect support of the site. I don't like that.
Isn't he not allowed to do so? Thats why its invest at your own risk right? just my opinion
No, we dont have any past relation with Doog, if that is what you asked. And because we are the only one knows about this other that Doog, now we know that Doogs intention is purely to help the community. All of his actions are based on his objective interest as he doesnt have any incentive to help us (except a relatively small tip that we gave him because he helps us to resolve few bugs in the site
, we want more quality dice sites, dont we?).About the previous cases, we think he did try his best. In the end with or without him there will be dice sites and people will keep on playing and investing. He did helped to select which one is good "in term of technical" from his expert judgement in this sector.