What I want to say is that the source of funds is completely irrelevant.
Him proving funds doesn't prove he will payout, but it at least proves that it might be possible. As you saw earlier in the thread, he was happy taking my money (~0.2) for a game in which I won I would have made 25k BTC -- money he clearly doesn't have, and had I won, he would've cheated me in some shape or form.
Give me an example of how he could cheat. The man told you the formula. Explain how he can use the formula that he gave to cheat in a card game.
I haven't looked into the card games yet -- but the fundamental flaw in the system is that he has never committed to any formula, and in fact promises to change it every 24 hours -- for supposed security reasons. This means if there was an outcome he doesn't like, he can simply say: "lol sorry, we changed the formula to one which you lost!" And we are left in the dark to if we were cheated or not. AKA not being provably fair.
The only way that he can cheat is to arrange his cards in such a way that the dealer gets a better hand, correct? He could use a different formula for each client seed so that he could twist the cards every time differently based on the client seed. But if the player would know the formula before the gameplay starts, there would be no way to cheat, would it?
In KENO, he could use a different formula for each client seed so that when you selected your numbers, he will arrange the drawn numbers so that there will be no matches and you will never win. But if he would tell you the KENO formula, he could not cheat, because you would be the last one to influence in a known manner the deck, right?
Now let's suppose that his formula is just ONE for each game and it changes every week. Would you say that it's provably fair then?
I am still waiting for the PM. Make me rich tonight.
Is there any provably fair system that you are NOT doubting?